The truth is catching up to the perpetrators and propagandists of the Lie Of The 20th Century and they are in the throes of a desperate campaign to silence that truth.
RT news reported the story below regarding the ‘private prosecution’ of 52 year old English singer/songwriter, Alison Chabloz – her offense? A ‘grossly offensive’ video ‘contain[ing] a song entitled, Survivors‘.
The song’s lyrics refer to the blatant falsehoods that have been thrown at the public for decades regarding what has been termed, ‘The Holocaust’. Since the 1970s independent historians and scientists have been exposing the impossibilities, distortions, and blatantly made-up stories contained in the ‘official’ ‘holocaust’ tales – their impeccable research and forensic tests cannot be argued against, so their work is censored and/or ridiculed, their reputations have been smeared and they’ve been ostracized from academia. Chabloz merely made a song related to the facts brought to light in this research.
Still, with the rise of the internet it isn’t that easy to control the publication and revelations regarding the ‘Holocaust’ hoax – and this has thrown the Zionists who perpetrated and propagate it into a panic. After all, without the 6 million lie the entire argument for the rogue state of Israel would fall flat on its face.
The term ‘Holocaust’ came into fashion after the 1960 appearance of the novel, Night – since its publication this novel has been credited to the Jewish Holocaust celebrity, Elie Wiesel. In the thoroughly researched and unimpeachable work, Holocaust High Priest, historian Warren Routledge not only exposes the hypocrisy of Wiesel’s claims as a humanitarian champion (i.e. Wiesel’s extreme level of hate for anyone and anything non-Jewish – particularly his indifference to the sufferings of the Palestinians), the doggedly manipulative personality of Wiesel, the shady history of the novel, and, most importantly, the veracity of Wiesel’s claim of Night as being a truthful documentation as an eye witness account.
It is from Wiesel’s claims that he witnessed ‘little children’ and ‘babies’ being ‘dumped into a ditch’ being burned alive in ‘gigantic flames’ – men too faced the same fate in another pit near by – that the term ‘holocaust’ is derived. ‘Holocaust’ being the traditional Jewish term used for a sacrifice completely consumed by fire. The problem is Wiesel claims he could see this during the detainees entry walk at Auschwitz-Berkinau concentration camp. Why is this a problem? Apparently Wiesel never thought about the aerial photographs being taken that would completely disprove his claims. In 1979 two CIA analysts released declassified aerial photos taken by Allied reconnaissance planes during the year 1944 – as Routledge put it, ‘These photos demolish both the open-pit burning and gas chamber allegations…with regard to the smoke and flame that allegedly came from Wiesel’s mythical pits and the crematoria, the [analysts] are more honest with their reader.’
Although survivors recalled that smoke and flame emanated continuously from the crematoria and was visible for miles, the photography we examined gave no proof of this.
To see more of the aerial photos click here to read John Clive Ball’s in-depth analysis.
Even the ‘official’ plaque at Auschwitz has changed the number of dead – in 1992 The New York Times reported, ‘It was previously thought that four million died at the camps. More recent research has revealed the figure to be closer to 1.5 million.’ The ‘more recent research’ is the unimpeachable research done by the brave historians who face criminal charges for their honest work – although the Times won’t point that out. The Times also won’t say that ‘it was previously thought’ because of the blatant lie machine that perpetrated and propagated the ‘thought’ of which the ‘paper of record’ was a part. Rense.com points out:
The ever declining numbers of alleged dead at Auschwitz are graphically illustrated by the plaques from the camp.
The first is the plaque that was on display at the Auschwitz camp from 1948 until 1989 and states “4 million” victims perished.
The second plaque currently on display at Auschwitz has the dramatically reduced number of victims to now only “1.5 million”…a casual reduction in the number of deaths by an incredible 2.5 million.
So, the official deaths at Auschwitz drop by a stunning 2.5 million, but the legendary overall Holocaust figure of 6,000,000 dead remains the same…
The Auschwitz death books contain the death certificates of some 69,000 individuals, of whom about 30,000 were listed as Jews. You may view various entries in the Auschwitz Death Books by clicking on links to the Auschwitz museum.
The Grand Total?
Using all available wartime records from the various camps it has been estimated that between 400,000 and 500,000 people died in the entire German concentration camp system (from all causes).
There are many more pieces of evidence and analysis to consider regarding the ‘Holocaust’ hoax – the Barnes Review website features the Holocaust Handbook library shop, and The Institute for Historical Review hosts numerous articles on the subject.
With all this said then, is it justice to put a singer/songwriter on trial for merely singing about the truth? Is it justice to put people into European jails/prisons for merely revealing historical evidence which contradicts decades old horror fables that have allowed and facilitated a totalitarian agenda which has thrown the world into a never ending spiral of violence and war?
Decent people need to stand up and say…ENOUGH!
A Derbyshire blogger, who is accused of posting a video calling Auschwitz a “theme park” and gas chambers a “hoax,” has appeared in court in what is believed to be the first private prosecution in the UK for anti-Jewish racism.
Alison Chabloz, 52, is accused of posting what the prosecution calls a “grossly offensive” video online in June this year. The video is said to contain a song she had written called ‘Survivors.’
The case was brought by the charity Campaign Against Anti-Semitism (CAA) after, it says, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) did not press charges.
The video allegedly includes lyrics such as “Did the Holocaust ever happen? Was it just a bunch of lies? Seems that some intend to pull the wool over our eyes.”
Other song lyrics are said to be: “Now Auschwitz, holy temple, is a theme park just for fools, the gassing zone a proven hoax, indoctrination rules.”
“History repeats itself, no limit to our wealth, thanks to your debts we’re bleeding you dry.
“We control your media, control all your books and TV, with the daily lies we’re feeding, suffering victimization.
“Sheeple have no realisation, you shall pay, all the way, until the break of day.”
According to the Daily Mail, prosecutor Jonathan Goldberg QC said: “The very reason why the charity is making an example of this case is because of their disappointment that the Crown Prosecution Service have investigated 15,442 cases in recent times, but only 12 of those cases have involved anti-Semitic hatred.
“Even though the fact is this phenomenon has grown enormously in our society at alarming proportions.”
Chabloz is charged with improper use of a public communications network, and appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Thursday to enter a not guilty plea.
An application by the defense to adjourn the case on the grounds that it was a “malicious prosecution” was rejected by the judge.
The trial date has been set for March 24 next year.
This week, it was announced that Britain would become one of the first nations to adopt an official definition of anti-Semitism, following an increase in the number of reported incidents targeting Jews.
The text states that “anti-semitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”
Although the British Police currently use a version of this definition, official adoption would also mean it will be used by councils, universities, and other public institutions.