How effective was the 7 April 2017 contrived allegation of a ‘chemical attack’ in Douma (Eastern Ghouta, Syria) by President Bashar al-Assad on the minds of the US populace? And by effective one should remember the question, Qui Bono?…who benefits?

Just to refresh a relevant point: On 12 April 2018, US Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, sat before the House Armed Services Committee in Washington and clearly stated:

…I cannot tell you that we have evidence, even though we certainly had media and social media indicators that either chlorine or saren were used…We’re still looking for the actual evidence. The OPCW, the organisation for the chemical weapons convention, we’re trying to get those inspectors in.

On the same day, in an NBC interview with Andrea Mitchell, trump’s UN secretary, nikki haley boldly claimed:

We definitely have enough proof…

Of course the world now knows that the US/UK/France went ahead with another breach of international law and attacked the sovereign State of Syria on the very next night of 13 April 2018 – the day before the delegation from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) was scheduled to arrive in Gouta to investigate the claims.

When Mattis refers to ‘media and social media indicators’ he is referring to the images and texts released to the world primarily via the so-called, ‘white helmets’ and associated groups. These ‘white helmets’ have been portrayed as ‘unarmed’ heroes amid the rubble and were even given an Academy Award in hollywood for ‘best documentary (short subject)’ in 2017. But this ‘heroic’ group has been exposed as something far different – they are, in fact, clearly identified as a faction of the terrorist organization, Jabhat al-Nusra (aka, the Al-Nusra Front), Al-Qaida’s Syrian arm. For a more in-depth look at this rotten bunch of creeps promoted as ‘heroes’ by the zionist controlled western media, click here to view a vid via The Corbett Report. It has also been openly established, even in israeli media, that al-nusra are, in fact, heavily connected and materially supported by…israel.

So, with all that said, the question of Qui Bono begins to find an answer.

Now let’s return to the question asked at the opening of this entry: How effective was the 7 April 2017 contrived allegation of a ‘chemical attack’ in Douma…by President Bashar al-Assad on the minds of the US populace?

On 26 April 2018, the jerusalem post published an article titled, NIKKI HALEY MOST POPULAR U.S. POLITICIAN, POLL FINDS. The link text reads: Israel-stalwart-Nikki-Haley-most-popular-US-politician-poll-finds. The article refers to the Quinnipiac University National Poll publicly released on 25 April 2018. It should be noted that the Quinnipiac polls question the populations in the states of Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Iowa, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia. At the Quinnipiac poll page the header reads: Trump Gets Better Grades On North Korea, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; But Voters Say Trump Is Making World Less Safe. 

Three of the questions asked in this poll should stand out for any astute person:

First, the question: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling terrorism? Respondents answered: Approve – 47%, Disapprove – 48%, and Don’t Know – 6%.

Clearly those polled are split regarding the issue.

The second question to obviously note is the question: Do you approve or disapprove of the way Nikki Haley is handling her job as Ambassador to the United Nations? Respondents answered: Approve – 63%, Disapprove – 17%, and Don’t Know – 20%.

It can be assumed that this question is directly related to the third question to be considered as it was perhaps most salient on the minds of the respondents at the time – and this is clear as it was included in the same poll.

The third question to consider: Do you support or oppose the military action that was taken against Syria after the Syrian military allegedly used chemical weapons? Respondents answered: Support – 61%, Oppose – 30%, Don’t Know – 9%.

So what do we make of all this? It should be clear – while those polled were split about trump’s handling of the ‘terrorist’ issue, haley received high marks based upon her salient role as UN ambassador during the alleged Syrian chemical weapons attack.

One wonders: If those polled were aware that haley’s ‘definite…proof’ came from the ‘social media’ reports referred to by Mattis, and those reports originated from a known terrorist organization supported by israel, would the numbers for any of these questions show the same opinion?

It should now be very clear who benefits from this alleged ‘chemical weapons attack’. And it certainly wasn’t the US as there was absolutely nothing to be gained from this rush to attack when it preempted any possible establishment to the veracity of the claims. One could argue that this rush was done precisely to deter any facts from ever being established.

Nikki haley (East Indian christian convert, born Nimrata Randhawa), is perhaps the most arrogant shill for israel that the US has ever had as ambassador in the UN. She was ‘chosen’ precisely for this reason. When halley was named as UN ambassador the jerusalem Post was very quick to point out, SOUTH CAROLINA GOVERNOR WHO OPPOSED ANTI-ISRAEL BDS TO BE TRUMP’S UN ENVOY – Last year, Nikki Haley signed into law a bill to stop efforts to boycott, divest and sanction Israel in a first for the nation on a state-wide level. As a matter of fact, this was the only possible reason why this shill, with no previous experience in International Relations, would be given the role. And it shows exactly how trump himself is beholden to his masters – no one can assume that he chose haley according to any original thought.

The video below was published on a YouTube channel – unfortunately, Fearless Freedom Press will not credit the creator or the channel as this video should be seen by as many people as possible – the despicable censorship at jewTube has a way of disappearing any and all accounts which reveal information critical of the criminal enterprise that is zionst israel…as well as their shills.

There are so many things to comment about regarding the following video – an entire post could be made regarding the so-called ‘biblical claims’ to israel, i.e. consider the fact that the oldest known hebrew text’s are the Dead Sea Scrolls which date c. 150 BCE – 70 CE, and the oldest mention of Jerusalem in hebrew can be found on a scrap of parchment which only dates to c. 700 BCE. Anyone who has any kind of knowledge about ancient history knows that the area now called, ‘israel’, had once enjoyed many well established cultures and peoples long before then. Fearless Freedom Press has already discussed the origins of the dark and destructive racial ideology now known as ‘judaism’ – the reader might be interested in clicking here if further context to these claims is needed.

This commentary will end with a quote from the jerusalem post which cited the Quinnipiac poll…this israel operative actually wrote these words – emphasis added:

Haley, seen as a steadying influence in an often tumultuous Trump administration, was an immediate shift in US involvement at the UN, opining that the body unfairly singles out Israel in its criticism. “The council must end its practice of wrongly singling out Israel for criticism,” Haley wrote in a June 2nd op-ed for The Washington Post. “When the council passes more than 70 resolutions against Israel, a country with a strong human rights record

And now, to the video, Arrogant Hate: Nikki Haley, Ayelet Shaked, and jew supremacism: